Public decision summary

BlueX Decision Dashboard

In Development — synthetic research demonstration, not investment advice or production performance.

This page shows how market-price cues move through review filters into clear decision labels (Buy, Sell, Wait Buy, Wait Sell, Hold, Warning Long/Short), then into portfolio monitoring. Formulas and private feature recipes stay private.

1. Decision Overview

Business question: After filters and gates, what review labels dominate this month, and should a reviewer act, wait, or monitor?

Filter pass rate (Dec 2025)
61.7%
Top label (Dec)
Hold
Year pass rate
61.9%
Cue families
A–E

Decision labels · December 2025

Hold13
Warning Short10
Warning Long9
Buy8
Wait Sell8
Wait Buy7
Sell5

Filter gate outcomes · December 2025

fail7
hold16
pass37

Cue family activity · December 2025

Consistency cross-check12
Distance warning band12
Fast confirmation12
Multi-horizon context12
Short-cycle structure12
Insight: December is Hold-heavy with active Warning Long/Short counts. Only about 62% of filtered reviews pass to a firm action label — the stack is designed to wait when families conflict, not to force trades.
Recommended monitoring: Track Wait Buy / Wait Sell versus Buy / Sell each month, and investigate any rise in filter fails before discussing allocation changes.

2. Portfolio & Risk

Supporting question: Is performance broad-based, or does one group dominate risk while decision labels stay cautious?

Indexed return (YTD)
-12.5%
Benchmark (YTD)
-2.6%
Dec net return
-3.2%
Dec volatility
12.8%
Dec max drawdown
-3.2%
Insight: Growth held about 33.6% of the synthetic book but contributed 59.9% of risk and -1.4% of December return contribution. Combined with Hold / Warning labels, the practical next step is concentration review — not automatic buying.

3. Validation & Pipeline

Trust question: Did quality checks pass, and does a prototype model earn a seat at the table?

Quality checks passed
12/12
Baseline balanced acc.
0.500
Logistic balanced acc.
0.455
Model status
Rejected

Public decision-review stages

#StageBusiness questionOutput
1Frame the review questionWhat should a reviewer decide this period?decision label or monitoring item
2Validate data readinessIs the period complete and trustworthy?quality pass or stop
3Score cue families A–EWhich public cue families are active?family activity map
4Apply review filtersDo conflicting families force a hold?filter_gate_result
5Assign decision labelBuy, Sell, Wait, Hold, or Warning — at what intensity?decision_label + intensity_band
6Aggregate for the periodHow often did each label fire this month?monthly decision counts
7Recommend and monitorWhat should the next review check?monitoring checklist

Full-year decision mix (synthetic)

Hold208
Wait Buy116
Wait Sell116
Warning Long83
Warning Short81
Buy68
Sell48
Limitation: Counts are synthetic demonstration aggregates shaped like the owner’s review language. They are not live trading history and do not disclose private formulas.